27 March 2018
HMRC have won a significant appeal, defeating a BBC presenter in the first IR35 ruling since 2011.
In Christa Ackroyd Media Ltd and the Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) ruled that the legislation (known as the 'IR35 rules') was applicable to those arrangements under which the BBC contracted one of the presenters of the regional news programme Look North.
Christa Ackroyd was engaged through her ‘personal service company’ Christa Ackroyd Media Ltd (CAM Ltd), under a seven-year contract with the BBC to provide services for up to 225 days per year. Ackroyd was appealing against demands for some £419,151 from HMRC relating to income tax and National Insurance contributions (NICs) for the tax years 2006/07 to 2012/13.
This appeal is specifically concerned with 'hypothetical contract'. HMRC argued that such a contract between the BBC and Ackroyd would have been a 'contract of service' rather than a 'contract for services', that her status was that of an employee, and that CAM Ltd should therefore be liable for tax and NICs accordingly. Christa Ackroyd however, contended that she was a self-employed contractor, and there was no further liability on the part of CAM Ltd.
The FTT found that the hypothetical contract would have been a contract of employment, considering factors such as:
- mutuality of obligation;
- control of what, when, where and how the taxpayer performed her role;
- right of substitution; and
- whether the taxpayer was in business on her own account,
In his ruling, the judge said that a hypothetical contract of seven years, for at least 225 days per year, and terminable only for a material breach, pointed towards a contract of employment. The length of the contract was 'pursuant to a highly stable, regular and continuous arrangement', involving a high degree of continuity rather than a succession of short term engagements. However, he also went on to say: ‘We do not consider that the fact the fees were payable on a monthly basis akin to the way an employee might be paid is significant. Nor is the absence of any provision for holiday, sick pay or pension entitlement.'
In this case, the ability of the BBC to 'control' the taxpayer, and the seven- year contract for what was effectively a full-time job, were the significant factors in the Tribunal's findings that the taxpayer was an employee under a hypothetical contract.
The FTT said that whilst this appeal is one of several others involving television presenters and personal service companies, it is not a lead case as such. It is a significant ruling though as it indicates that the IR35 can be enforced where HMRC see fit to do so.
For further information about this topic, please contact me or speak to one of our accountants in Newcastle, Jarrow or Sunderland.
As one of the leading firms of accountants in the North East, with offices in Newcastle, Sunderland and Jarrow, we have the expertise to advise you on a wide range of tax related issues. If you would like to speak to one of our local experts, please contact us.
